Not So Strong a Case

January 9, 2008

From the Evening Star

Voter cited by opponents of Indiana’s ID law registered in two states

Monday night from her Florida home, Ewing said she and her husband Kenneth winter in Florida and summer in Indiana. She admitted to registering to vote in both states, but stressed that she¹s never voted in Florida. She also has a Florida drivers license, but when she tried to use it as her photo ID in the Indiana elections in November 2006, poll workers wouldnt accept it.

Seems she’s able to go through the process of getting voter registration in TWO states:

    At the Charlotte County, Fla. voter registration office, Sandy Wharton, vote qualifying office manager, said Ewing registered to vote in Charlotte County on Sept. 18, 2002, and signed an oath that she was a Florida resident and understood that falsifying the voter application was a third-degree felony punishable by prison and a fine up to $5,000. Wharton said her office checked Ewing’s Florida residency and qualified her on Oct. 2, 2002. On Oct. 4, 2002, they mailed her Florida voter card to her, to the West Lafayette, Ind. address that Ewing gave as a mailing address.

Maybe it’s not the identity requirement she objects to. It must be a memory problem.

    However, Ewing didn’t vote in Florida that year, nor has she ever voted in Charlotte County, Wharton said. But, just a month after receiving her Florida voter card, she did vote in the November 2002 elections in Tippecanoe County, Ind., according to Heather Maddox, co-director of elections and registration in Tippecanoe.
    Ewing confirmed that she is registered in both states to vote, but at first said the Florida registration came automatically with her driver’s license. She repeatedly denied signing the oath on the Florida application. She also said Indiana mailed her an absentee ballot, but she didn’t use it or vote that year.

Voter cited by opponents of Indiana’s ID law registered in two states

Why Doesn’t Someone Ask Her What She Means?

Looking at the transcript of the “mini-meltdown” from the other day, I wonder why  no politician or reporter asks Hillary what she means.

“It’s not easy, it’s not easy, and I couldn’t do it if I just didn’t passionately believe it was the right thing to do,” she said.

“I have so many opportunities for this country. I don’t want to see us all fall back,” she said, her voice breaking in the last phrase.

“This is very personal for me,” she said to supportive applause from the small gathering, at which she’d been discussing policy around a table for an hour. “It’s not just political, it’s not just public — I see what’s happening. We have to reverse it.”

It might give people some insight into what is drawing a tear to her eye - is is the ideology she espouses or the risk of personal loss she fears? What’s happening and needs to be reversed? From what is she afraid we’ll “fall back?”

Inquiring minds want to know.

http://www.classicalvalues.com/

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here