He Not Only Lied,

November 23, 2007

He’s using those lies to hatch a sinister plot to take away our liberties!

Noah Pollak, writing at The Corner on National Review Online, posted about a wingnut.

But it’s not just any wingnut - this guy used to be the NY Times Bureau Chief in the Middle East during the 1990s.

Chris Hedges’ conspiracy dreams:

This war (a postulated war with Iran - e.d), and especially Iranian retaliatory strikes on American targets, will be used to silence domestic dissent and abolish what is left of our civil liberties. It will solidify the slow-motion coup d’etat that has been under way since the 9/11 attacks. It could mean the death of the Republic.

Those terrible Cheney Halibushitler plotters have been scheming since 2001 to just take away everyone’s rights and impose a totalitarian regime.

It’s not like all those wonderful places where Mr. Hedges has friends - Iran, Gaza, Syria, Lebanon (at least the Hizbollah-controlled portion), or Saudi Arabia. Those people are nice people. Chris wants to have the moral high ground when he has to go back to them and ask for forgiveness…

For what?

The Corner on National Review Online

The Internet, Identity and the Death of Distance

I listened to a presentation by Bruce Schneier at the Educause Conference on “Information Security - Ten Trends.”

It was very interesting and informative about where data and information security in general are headed on the Internet.

What struck me as I listened to the talk was that the real-world concept of communities and neighborhoods has been misunderstood on the Internet.

There are communities and neighborhoods, just as in the real world. They just don’t have some critical features that provide protection and comfort to people in real world neighborhoods.

One critical difference is the absence of distance and barriers. Communities of all kinds are effectively cheek by jowl with all of the other communities on the Internet. Some communities have gates (logins and/or passwords), but these are nowhere near as effective as people believe the analog versions are.

Everyone of us has to travel near or through these other neighborhoods just to get to our own homepage. We often know next to nothing about what those neighborhoods are like. We may not even be able to know with any certainty.

As a result, it’s very hard to keep unsavory characters out of my computer.

Another feature of online communities is that they lack the level of “membership” control that the real world has. This isn’t a problem specific to communities, it’s a general tendency of the Internet.

To gain greater use or benefit, we have given up a greater degree of control over our lives and what others know about us.

To quote Tim Berners-Lee:

The less inviting side of sharing is losing some control. Indeed, at each layer — Net, Web, or Graph — we have ceded some control for greater benefits.

The analogy for all this is a public park.

  • Some of the visitors come in vehicles with doors and locks (strong computer security practices)
  • Some come in those kinds of vehicles, but they’ve left the doors or windows unlocked (poor or default implementation of the security protocols - one of Schneiers main complaints)
  • Some come in and set up tents (weak protection, suitable only to protect against innocent or non-aggressive snoopers)
  • Some appear to just be laying on the ground (wide open or unused security)

I’ll post more on this topic of neighborhoods and security.

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here